Kommentar zu [CPW11]

I see a lot of similarities with my dissertation [2] or [3].

  • the morphisms in [1] are a restriction of place-preserving morphisms (definition 4.19 and definition 5.27, respectively in [2]).
  • the concept of true morphisms [1], does not occur, however, the morphisms from an unfolding to the original net system (universal arrows) in [2] are true.
  • Proposition 4 and 5 in [1] correspond to Lemma 7.40 in [2],
  • Proposition 6 in [1] is used/proved in the proof of 7.41
  • The unfolding in Theorem 1 [1] is the same as the unfolding in Proposition 7.41 [2] (as mentioned, the universal arrow is true)

References

  • [1] CPW11 Jean-Michel Couvreur, Denis Poitrenaud, Pascal Weil. Branching Processes of General Petri Nets. in Application and Theory of Petri Nets 2011. LNCS.
  • [2] Walter Keller. Clustering for Petri Nets. Theoretical Computer Science 308 (2003) 145-197.
  • [3] Walter Keller. Petri nets for reverse engineering. Ph. D Thesis, University of Zurich. Available at http://www.ifi.uzh.ch/research/theses-archive/doctoral-theses.html or http://www.wlkl.ch